be part of a carbon-conscious, carbon-skilled and carbon-responsive workforce
Home News Latest
latest carbon news

 

 



Becoming an NGERS auditor PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bruce Thomas   
Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:01

In January 2010 the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, by way of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Auditor Registration) Instrument 2010, set out the requirements for registration as a greenhouse and energy auditor under the National Greenhouse and Energy Regulations 2008. 

The requirements for registration are outlined in more detail in the Greenhouse and Energy Auditor Registration Guidelines released in March 2010. 

Registration is effected by completion of an online registration form accessed at the DCCEE's website. 

Why register as an NGER auditor? What is the business opportunity? 

Under the audit provisions of the NGER Act and Regulations, the Greenhouse and Energy Data Officer (the GEDO) has the authority to register auditors and to request that audits of returns provided by registered organisations (i.e. corporations that are liable to report) be carried out. 

Audits requested by the GEDO are in two forms: 

  • An assurance engagement - an audit where the auditor provides an independent opinion on the matter being audited
  • A verification engagement -  an audit which verifies the matter being audited (without an opinion) 

The GEDO may appoint a specific auditor to carry out the audit or request that the corporation being audited appoint a registered auditor to carry out the audit. 

In order to be eligible to carry out a Greenhouse and Energy Audit for the GEDO you must be registered by the GEDO.

Greenhouse and energy audit engagements may also be requested by corporation's (risk committees and boards) seeking professional assurance that the NGER information being reported to the GEDO is compliant and accurate. These audits will form part of corporate governance practices to ensure that no false reporting has taken place (for which the corporation and the CEO face significant penalties), and to demonstrate to stakeholders confidence (via assurance) in the reported data.  With this type of internal assurance expected to grow, especially as more organisations meet compulsory NGER requirements, this area represents an additional market opportunity for all auditors. 

If you are not a registered greenhouse and energy auditor then in most cases you will not be engaged for this work - a missed market opportunity. 

What do you need to do to qualify for registration as an NGER auditor? 

There are four categories of greenhouse and energy auditors. Category 1 (technical) auditors will in most cases come from the professional engineering field and work in conjunction with the "traditional" audit professionals, Category 1 (non-technical) and Category 2 auditors are expected to come from the traditional audit firms of accountants. The difference between the two categories relates to skills and experience, and determines who is eligible to be an audit team leader. Category 3 auditors are those from Category 2 that have completed 2 or more NGER audits. 

Category 1(non-technical) and Category 2 auditors need to be able to demonstrate to the GEDO and provide corroborative evidence of the following:

  • Tertiary qualifications
  • National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting legislation knowledge including a statement of how the knowledge was obtained
  • Audit experience
  • Audit qualifications and training

 Full details of the requirements are contained in the Greenhouse and Energy Auditor Registration Guidelines available at the DCCEE website

Last Updated on Monday, 03 May 2010 22:42
 
Savage NSW Electricity Price Rises Approved PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rob Nicholls   
Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:19

The NSW Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) today confirmed its decision to allow standard retail electricity prices to rise steeply from 1 July 2010. 

The decision published by IPART in its final report, means that standard tariffs which determines the retail price paid for electricity, will rise up to 64% over the next 3 years. 

When asked to comment on the scale of the approved price increase for electricity, the acting chairman and CEO of IPART, Jim Cox said "I don't think we have had anything as big as this one".[1] 

While a proportion of the price rise is for the proposed federal governments Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, 42% of the rise is to support the infrastructure investment requirements needed to improve network security and reliability of supply. 

Under the approved price rise, the average household electricity bill is set to increase by between $577 and $918 by 2013, taking into account the introduction of the CPRS.

Irrespective of whether the CPRS scheme eventually passes, over the first year of higher tariffs an Integral Energy customers average bill will rise by 7%, for Energy Australia customers, 10% and Country Energy customers by 13%. 

For the average small business in Sydney, the electricity price rise impact is expected to be around $1,433 a year. 

For many businesses this will have a significant impact on their bottom line, especially where they are an energy intensive business such as manufacturing. The ability to pass on the higher costs to consumers will be limited. 

Such savage increases in electricity prices are likely to be a catalyst for business investigating ways to cut down their electricity use. This will include looking for ways to implement energy efficiency practices into their operations. 

Whilst the adoption of new technology including smart metering systems, energy efficient machinery, low energy lighting and powering down office equipment will be considerations, the training of staff for the provision of skills to support the re-engineering of procedures, processes and practices around the workplace will become increasingly important. 

Newly accredited vocational education training programs in disciplines such as carbon management are likely to become vital for business looking for product and process innovation for competitive advantage in the marketplace whilst lowering energy usage.


[1] NSW electricity bills to soar, 18/03/10, Sydney Morning Herald Online

Last Updated on Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:47
 
Energy Efficiencies Opportunities Program drives emissions and financial savings for industry PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bruce Thomas   
Wednesday, 10 March 2010 19:19

The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism has released the first report on actions under the Energy Efficiency Opportunities (EEO) program. “First Opportunities, A Look at Results from 2006-2008 for the Energy Efficiency Opportunity program” notes the following:

  • Opportunities have been identified to save more than 6 million tonnes of CO2-e per year (1.1% of Australia’s total emissions for 2006-07)
  • As of December 2008 corporations reporting under the program had assessed 1,019 PJ of total energy use “identifying opportunities with energy savings of 67.7 PJ, or 6.6% of their assessed energy use….yielding a potential financial return of $736 million if these projects are implemented.[i]”

To put this energy saving in context, 67.7 PJ is the equivalent total energy consumption of 1.4 million Australian households.

It is interesting to note that the aluminium, ferrous metals and oil and gas industries who strongly opposed the introduction of the CPRS (i.e. a price on carbon) were at the forefront of those identifying substantial opportunities to save energy by way of the EEO program.

The identified energy savings are expected to deliver net annual financial benefits of $736 million from projects with a payback period of less than 4 years. Of these identified financial savings, $530 million relates to projects with a payback period of less than two years.

With energy prices continuing to increase, the argument to implement energy efficiency measures is compelling.

Whilst the EEO program is directed at large Australian businesses, the opportunity for the SME sector to improve efficiency, reduce emissions and save money should not be overlooked.

Developing the requisite skills within organisations to drive energy efficiency and other emissions strategy must be a high priority for all sectors of the business community, civil society and households.

The provision of competency based workplace training is the most efficient means of gaining these skills.

Electricity prices have, and will continue, to increase. The Financial Review today reports that Western Australian electricity prices need to increase by 75% over four years to reflect the true cost of electricity.[ii]


[i] First Opportunities Report http://www.ret.gov.au/energy/Documents/energyefficiencyopps/PDF/EEO_FirstOpportunitiesReport_2010_FINAL.pdf

[ii] Australian Financial Review 8 March 2010, page 8.

 
True cost of oil not reflected at the bowser PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bruce Thomas   
Sunday, 07 March 2010 14:05

Terry Tamminem, until recently head of the Californian Environmental Protection Agency, was quoted yesterday [i] as suggesting that the price of petrol would need to rise from current levels of $1.20 to $3.60 per litre if all externalities:

  • health costs
  • congestion
  • impact on the environment
  • energy security measures

are taken into account.

The community bears the cost via higher taxes.

Due to the lack of transparency in the true cost of bringing products and services to market, there exists an unchallenged acceptance of these costs.

Trebling petrol prices (an increase of $2.40 per litre) to incorporate externalities makes the impact of a price on carbon pale into insignificance. Using the accepted conversion factor of 2.5 kg of carbon dioxide emissions from burning a litre of petrol, a carbon price of $20 per tonne equates to a price impact of 5 cents per litre; less than the weekly fluctuation in Sydney petrol prices from Tuesday through to Saturday.Examples of technological breakthroughs that have resulted in improved fuel efficiency include hybrid vehicles and high performance diesel engines.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 09 March 2010 16:01
Read more...
 
Byron Bay court ruling puts councils on notice to consider climate change impacts when making planning decisions PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rob Nicholls   
Thursday, 04 February 2010 18:50

In a landmark decision on Monday 1st February, the NSW Land and Environment Court ruled against Byron Shire Council which sought to prevent a resident building a barrier to protect his property that was threatened by coastal erosion. 

The court has also ordered that the council must "maintain, monitor and repair beach stabilisation works at four other vulnerable sites".[1] 

Whilst a lack of a coordinated national approach to coastline management and the impact of climate change has been identified as a factor, the decision by Byron Shire Council to put the local planning ordinance in place and then try to legally defend has been singled out as a major concern. 

Although local governments are not supported by a uniform national approach to climate change planning, the apparent lack of knowledge, skills and expertise in climate change risks, adaptation strategies and mitigation appears to be a shortcoming of growing concern. 

For councils that manage areas of low-lying coastal land there is a strong and clear message that is being sent that if "they allow development without taking into account climate change impacts they will be held liable".[2] 

Councillors who are not equipped with the skills, expertise or frameworks in climate change risk management are not only a risk to the council but also to ratepayers and residents who are affected by council decisions. 

It's not enough to have general knowledge and awareness around climate change, today's key decision makers must have access to demonstrable competencies and capacity that only accredited training programs in climate change risk and carbon management can deliver. 

Formal learning and demonstration of associated competencies and skills is an important area of development to ensure a consistent and serious approach to the management of climate change risks by councils. This learning platform is also an opportunity for knowledge sharing through case studies to further support improved decision making. 

For individual councillors ,it may eventually arise that liability insurance will only be available to those who can  demonstrate they have completed appropriate certified training, including training in climate change risk and carbon management

[1] "Coastal Councils want legal sea change", The Australian Financial Review, p3, 030210

[2] ibid, quote by Mark Bartley, DLA Phillips Fox

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 6

the cti team

  • Bruce Thomas

    brucesml
    climate change & carbon risk & policy


  • Rob Nicholls

    robsml
    strategy and market development


  • Glenn Davidson

    glennsml
    coaching & enterprise collaboration


  • John Yealland

    johnsml
    manufacturing, product and business adaptation


  • Bill McGhie

    billsml
    organisation capacity building & training


  • Richard Bolus

    richsml
    strategic engagement