|
|||
|
|||
The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism has released the first report on actions under the Energy Efficiency Opportunities (EEO) program. “First Opportunities, A Look at Results from 2006-2008 for the Energy Efficiency Opportunity program” notes the following:
To put this energy saving in context, 67.7 PJ is the equivalent total energy consumption of 1.4 million Australian households.
It is interesting to note that the aluminium, ferrous metals and oil and gas industries who strongly opposed the introduction of the CPRS (i.e. a price on carbon) were at the fore...
Read more...Terry Tamminem, until recently head of the Californian Environmental Protection Agency, was quoted yesterday [i] as suggesting that the price of petrol would need to rise from current levels of $1.20 to $3.60 per litre if all externalities:
are taken into account.
The community bears the cost via higher taxes.
Due to the lack of transparency in the true cost of bringing products and services to market, there exists an unchallenged acceptance of these costs.
Trebling petrol prices (an increase of $2.40 per litre) to incorporate externalities makes the impact of a price on carbon pale into insignificance. Using the accepted conversion factor of 2.5 kg of carbon dioxide emissions from burning a litre of petrol, a carbon price of $20 per tonne equates to a price impact of 5 cents per litre; less than the weekly fluctuation in Sydney petrol prices from Tuesday through to Saturday.Examples of technological breakthroughs that ...
Read more...